It's time to talk about religion.
Religious matters are personal and often very complex. However when it comes to child molestation, the issue becomes as simple as any "truly American" movie- the bad guys should get punished.
The media have given publicity to enough stories in the recent years, involving Catholic personas high in the hierarchy, who have been charged with child molestation.It seems to me that it is the strict prohibitions and supression of what is one of the most natural human needs- sex and companionship, which has led to stories like Billy's. This is yet another example to me of where organised religion has gone wrong. To deny people what is natural, ask them to supress it and constantly reinforce a feeling of guilt for being human cannot end well, and anyone who thinks otherwise has got another thing comming.
Here's generally what happened:
Father Engelhardt plied Billy, a fifth grader,with sacramental wine and pulled pornographic magazines out of a bag in the sacristy and told the child it was time “to become a man,”.“After that, Billy was in effect passed around to Engelhardt’s colleagues,” the report says. “Father Edward Avery undressed with the boy, told him that God loved him,” and then had him perform sex.“Next was the turn of Bernard Shero, a teacher in the school, with whom the parents of the boy had shared about the molestations . Shero offered Billy a ride home but instead stopped at a park, told Billy they were ‘going to have some fun,’ took off the boy’s clothes, orally and anally raped him and then made him walk the rest of the way home.”Billy fell apart and turned to heroin. (NY Times, 2011, "Avenging Altar Boy")
In any profession, once a person has been convicted for child molestation, they are never allowed to work with children again. Aparently, the Church are under no such obligation.
I am not preaching against organised religion, this is a personal choice. I don't claim that all catholics are bad people.
What I am saying is that it is not acceptable to forgive religion, to tip-toe around it or allow for more. It is not acceptable for the the Pope to cover up a child molestor, and having done so, I don't know what he is doing still being the head of the Catholic church. The reason why he still is on his post is, i am guessing, money and power. And it upsets me that, just like anything else that is too complicated and takes more effort than The X Factor, we seem to lack the attention span to even remember it ever happened.
When Michael Jackson was accused for child molestation, it destroyed his career. Sadly so, as his accusors later admitted they had been forced by their parents, for money, to accuse him of such terrible acts, even though all they had received from him was company, attention and a great time in Neverland. He was cleared of all alegations, yet still the seed of doubt remains.
Why can't we be more socially just, socially responsible and socially interested to give a damn about the thousands of children who have been and still are molested by priests, whom these children trust and who are supposed to give them guidance in life? Why is it so appealing to deny an innocent pop-start forgiveness but grant it to those who don't practice what they preach?
1 comment:
Hey Reah,
I fully agree with your conclusion: we, as social beings, have the responsibility towards everyone else to be aware and active when it comes to prevent and punish things such as child abuse by whomever.
I disagree, however, with your judgment of the church as an institution. I am not religious myself and I do think that there are many wrongs with the clergy, especially at the positions of power - propaganda against the use of condoms, the birth control pill and, as you said, covering up child abuse and protecting the perpetrators. Yet, in my opinion, to blame the actions of men on the ideals of an institution is wrong. It's not their believes or the enforced celibacy that 'made them' do what they did. A statement like that seems to me to merely take the blame from their shoulders.
I would like to believe that for as many priests that are child molesters many more, who live under these same abstinence rules, aren't. Likewise, media has shown us a lot of other examples of child abuse carried out by 'free' men. To reduce a problem like this to lack of sex - which maybe wasn't what you meant - isn't any closer to solve it as is forgetting about it.
This was just the introduction to your argument and I do agree with how you finished it.
Some great pieces, by the way, keep them coming!
Post a Comment